Andrew Chin

Associate Professor of Law

Education

  • J.D., Yale University (1998)
  • Ph.D., Oxford University (1991)
  • B.S., University of Texas at Austin (1987)

After serving as student government president at Texas, Chin earned his doctorate studying combinatorial mathematics and computational complexity theory at St. Catherine's College, Oxford, on a Rhodes Scholarship and a National Science Foundation Graduate Fellowship.

Between 1991 and 1995, he taught mathematics at Texas A&M University, computer science at King's College, University of London, and public policy at the University of Texas at Austin. At Yale, he published a paper written during his first semester as a note in the Yale Law Journal, and several subsequent law review articles. After graduation, he clerked for Judge Henry H. Kennedy Jr. of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and assisted Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson and his law clerks in the drafting of the findings of fact in United States v. Microsoft Corporation.

Chin then practiced in the corporate and intellectual property departments in the Washington, D.C., office of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, LLP. He is of counsel to Intellectual Property Solutions, P.L.L.C., where he prepares and prosecutes patent applications in computer and Internet technology.

Chin joined the faculty of the University of North Carolina School of Law in 2001. He teaches antitrust, intellectual property, and patent law. More information about Chin's work, including published articles and course outlines, is available via his website and his blog.

Curriculum Vitae PDF

Selected Publications

Show All Publications

  • Differential Privacy as a Response to the Reidentification Threat: The Facebook Advertiser Case Study (A. Chin and A. Klinefelter), 90 N.C. L. REV. 1417 (2012). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, SSRN, Hein]
  • The Ontological Function of the Patent Document, 74 U. PITT. L. REV. 263 (2012). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, SSRN, Hein, BEPress]
  • Gene Probes as Unpatentable Printed Matter, 20 FED. CIR. B.J. 527 (2011). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, SSRN, Hein, BEPress]
  • Installed Base Opportunism and the Scope of Intellectual Property Rights in Software Products, 10 WAKE FOREST INTELL. PROP. L.J. 323 (2010). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, Hein]
  • On Abstraction and Equivalence in Software Patent Doctrine:  A Response to Bessen, Meurer and Klemens, 16 J. INTELL. PROP. L. 197 (2009). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, Hein, BEPress]
  • Search for Tomorrow: Some Side Effects of Patent Office Automation, 87 N.C. L. REV. 1617 (2009). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, Hein]
  • Artful Prior Art and the Quality of DNA Patents, 57 ALA. L. REV. 975 (2006). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, SSRN, Hein]
  • Decoding Microsoft: A First Principles Approach, 40 WAKE FOREST L. REV. 1 (2005). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, Hein]
  • Antitrust Analysis in Software Product Markets: A First Principles Approach, 18 HARV. J.L. & TECH. 1 (2004). [Westlaw, Lexis/Nexis, Hein]
  • Making the World Wide Web Safe for Democracy: A Medium Specific First Amendment Analysis, 19 HASTINGS COMM. & ENT. L.J. 309 (1997). [Westlaw, Hein]
UNC School of Law | Van Hecke-Wettach Hall | 160 Ridge Road, CB #3380 | Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3380 | 919.962.5106


If you are seeing this, you are either using a non-graphical browser or Netscape 4.x (4.7, 4.8, etc.) and this page appears very plain. If you are using a 4.x version of Netscape, this site is fully functional but lacks styles and optimizations available in other browsers. For full functionality, please upgrade your browser to the latest version of Internet Explorer or Firefox.