(From Legal Scholarship Network: Legal Studies Research Paper Series, University of North Carolina
Towards a Series of Academic Norms for #Lawprof Twitter
Carissa Byrne Hessick
This short symposium contribution discusses the virtues and the vices of law professors participating in a now-popular form of public discourse: Twitter. It also offers some tentative thoughts on what professional norms ought to apply to law professors who identify themselves as law professors on Twitter. Specifically, it suggests that law professors should assume that, each time they tweet about a legal issue, they are making an implicit claim to expertise about that issue. It also suggests that law professors who participate on Twitter should do so primarily to help promote reasoned debate.
-January 12, 2018
Finality and the Capital/Non-Capital Punishment Divide
Carissa Byrne Hessick
This book chapter examines the role that concerns about finality have played in both capital cases and juvenile life-without-parole sentencing cases. It will describe how finality has shaped the Supreme Court’s death penalty cases, as well as the role it has played in recent juvenile life-without-parole cases. It will then offer some tentative thoughts on whether the non-capital finality concerns – specifically, the perceived need for post-sentencing assessments – should be extended to capital defendants and how post-sentencing assessments might inform the ongoing debate over the death penalty abolition in the United States.
-December 9, 2017
Matthew Hale, on the Law of Nature, Reason, and Common Law: Selected Jurisprudential Writings
Gerald J. Postema
Lawyer, judge, public figure and Member of Parliament, legal historian, theologian, and amateur natural philosopher, Sir Matthew Hale worked and wrote in the middle decades of the seventeenth century, that most turbulent period of English political history. A deeply reflective practitioner, he observed, analysed, and gave theoretical expression to the common law from many different vantage points. His reflections on reason, law and the foundations political authority are collected in this volume. It sets two of Hale’s pivotal but nearly inaccessible jurisprudential works—his Treatise on the Nature of Laws in General and touching the Law of Nature and his “Reflections on Mr Hobbes His Dialogue of the Laws”—in context of other key works of legal history and legal and constitutional theory. The Treatise reveals a complex general understanding of law and moral and legal reasoning. “Reflections” brings these very general considerations to bear on English common law, through a critical response to Hobbes’s all-out attack on common-law jurisprudence. “Reflections” suggests a conception of judicial reasoning, and a view of political authority, that deepens the view articulated in Hale’s longer and more systematic work. Hale’s views on practical reasoning, discussed in Treatise, are elaborated and related explicitly to the necessary discipline of law in his “Preface to Rolle’s Abridgement,” in parts of his History of the Common Law, and, crucially, in “Reflections.” The view, suggested in Treatise, that “human law” is necessarily instituted in the “constitutions” (practices, customs, and ways) of specific communities—manifesting therein their “consent”—is enriched and deepened in History and “Considerations touching Amendment of the Law.” His views about the foundations of political authority, sounded in Treatise, are argued at length in Prerogatives of the King and “Reflections.” Taken together, these writings offer a rich and subtle articulation of the classical common-law understanding of law reason, and authority. The editor presents these seminal writings in a text accessible to modern readers interested in law, jurisprudence, political theory, philosophy or intellectual history. He contributes an extended introduction, setting the writings in their historical and theoretical context.
-December 6, 2017